Low-code development is a way to create software applications using a visual, drag-and-drop interface, rather than traditional coding. The idea behind low-code is to make it easier for people who are not experienced software developers to create and modify software applications. This is achieved by providing a visual interface that allows users to build applications by dragging and dropping pre-built components, such as forms, buttons, and data fields, onto a canvas.
Traditional development, on the other hand, requires a programmer to write code in a specific programming language, such as Java, C#, or Python. The programmer needs to have a deep understanding of the language and the platform on which the software is being developed, as well as experience with software development best practices, such as testing and debugging.
Here are some key differences between low-code and traditional development:
- Ease of use: Low-code platforms are designed to be easy to use, even for people with little or no programming experience. Traditional development, on the other hand, can be quite difficult and time-consuming for someone who is not an experienced programmer.
- Speed of development: Because low-code platforms provide pre-built components that can be easily dragged and dropped onto a canvas, application development can be much faster than traditional development. This can be especially beneficial for organizations that need to build applications quickly or for projects with tight deadline.
- Level of control: Low-code platforms can be more restrictive than traditional development in terms of the level of control that users have over the final product. For example, low-code platforms may not offer all the options and customization that traditional development does, since the pre-built components are often limited. In contrast, traditional development allows for flexibility to build a custom solutions.
- Scalability: Low-code applications are usually easy to scale up as they do not require custom code and the platform provides the ability to add new components and modules. Traditional development can be more difficult to scale up because it often requires rewriting code and customizing the software to meet the new requirements.
- Cost:Low-code platforms can be less expensive than traditional development, as they are often cloud-based, and may require less resources. Traditional development, however, can be more expensive, as it requires a team of experienced programmers and development tools and environments, which can be costly to acquire and maintain.
Next I want to share with you some links from other authors that talk about the differences between lowcode and traditional development.
If you find any other article of interest, let me know.
- The website of leading low-code development platform provider, Outsystems, compares low-code with traditional development in this article: https://www.outsystems.com/low-code-vs-traditional-development/
- In this blog post, the author provides a detailed comparison of low-code and traditional development, including the pros and cons of each approach: https://www.cuelogic.com/blog/low-code-vs-traditional-development/
- Gartner, a leading research and advisory company, provides a comprehensive analysis of low-code development and its impact on traditional development in this report: https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3938519
- This article by Forrester Research, another leading research and advisory company, provides a comparison of low-code and traditional development and discusses the benefits and challenges of each approach: https://www.forrester.com/report/The+Forrester+Wave+LowCode+Development+Platforms+Q2+2020/-/E-RES145722
- Finally, this blog post from the software development company, Propeller, compares low-code and traditional development, and explores the use cases for each approach: https://propeller.com/low-code-vs-traditional-development-whats-right-for-your-project/
I hope these resources will be helpful to you in learning more about the differences between low-code and traditional development.